![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() By Xinqi SU Hong Kong (AFP) June 29, 2021
China's national security law for Hong Kong has shaken the city's legal foundations in the year since it was imposed, lawyers say, with court decisions and sweeping new powers for prosecution fuelling concerns about rights and the rule of law. Unlike the Communist Party-controlled courts in mainland China, Hong Kong has an internationally respected common law system that forms the bedrock of its reputation as a global financial hub. Circumventing Hong Kong's own legislature, the security law was drafted in Beijing with the wording kept secret until it came into force on June 30 last year as authorities tightened controls after massive and often violent pro-democracy protests in 2019. In the year since the law was enacted, Hong Kong judges have declared that jury trials are not a constitutional right, and the presumption of bail is not guaranteed in national security cases. "It's like an alien species invading our territory, an unstoppable sandstorm sweeping from the north," a defence lawyer told AFP. He was one of four defence counsels involved in ongoing national security cases that spoke to AFP, on condition of anonymity so they could speak freely. They alleged that Hong Kong courts now only "paid lip service" to rights when national security rules came up against longstanding protections in the city's own legal system. Authorities have arrested 114 people under the security law, and 64 of them have been prosecuted. A watershed moment came last week, when the trial of the first person charged under the security law began without a jury and with three specially selected judges. Trial-by-jury has been a 176-year-old cornerstone of Hong Kong's common law system. Constitutional law scholars have warned of the threat to the city's legal system, with courts trying to avoid irritating Chinese authorities, who hold final authority in security law cases. "When (the court) gives up a fundamental right without any rigorous scrutiny, it is also providing an intellectual rationalisation for a draconian regime," Johannes Chan, the University of Hong Kong's chair professor of public law, wrote in a journal article in May. "If the judiciary is not vigorous and vigilant in protecting fundamental human rights, there would no longer be any rule of law." Hong Kong's judiciary declined to "comment on the legal or other substantive issues in individual cases", citing the principle of judicial independence. - 'An impossible task' - Hong Kong and Chinese authorities say the security law has successfully restored stability after the 2019 demonstrations, but critics say it has cracked the legal firewall between Hong Kong and China. The law has radically transformed the political and legal landscape of a city authoritarian China promised would be able to keep key liberties after its 1997 return from Britain. China now has jurisdiction over some cases and the law has allowed its security agents to operate openly in Hong Kong for the first time. The law has also removed the presumption of bail for non-violent crimes. Those charged have to instead prove to judges they will not pose any sort of national security threat. Defending the accused "is an impossible task," one lawyer told AFP. "This is presumption of guilt." In an extreme case, 47 pro-democracy activists facing national security charges had to undergo a four-day marathon bail hearing in March. One of them fainted from exhaustion and several had to be rushed to hospital. "Our judicial independence and rule of law are now like a piece of glass with a crack," the first defence lawyer said. "The crack will continue to grow and eventually break the glass." There are fears that the new environment may impact even judicial appointments. The Financial Times reported last week that pro-Beijing lawmakers in Hong Kong stepped in to prevent the appointment of a judge in the city's top court, citing two sources familiar with the matter. - 'Shadow of a giant' - Authorities have more weapons under the security law that they have yet to use, including the extradition of defendants to mainland China's opaque, Party-controlled justice system, and closed-door trials with citizens and journalists shut out. Brenda Hale, a senior British judge, announced this month she will quit Hong Kong's top court when her term ends, stating there were "all sorts of question marks" over the new national security law, according to media reports. Some have argued that given the power Chinese authorities now have over these cases there is not a lot of room for Hong Kong's courts to manoeuvre. Hong Kong University law professor Simon Young said the approach taken by the courts so far is "a wise strategic decision" to preserve judicial independence, as they avoid the risk of challenges that could see final arbiter Beijing further erode the city courts' powers. "The court maintains 'the rule of law in the shadow of a giant'," he wrote in an analysis in March. "The giant appears to be content for now."
![]() ![]() Furious patriots: China's diplomatic makeover backfires Beijing (AFP) June 27, 2021 For over a year they have whipped up outrage against the West, but as China's "wolf warrior" diplomats are told to tone down the fury, they face an unexpected source of opposition: nationalists at home. Under fire in recent years over issues ranging from human rights abuses to blame for the Covid-19 pandemic, Beijing unleashed a new breed of diplomat that became known as "wolf warriors" - a popular term for belligerent nationalism inspired by a Chinese blockbuster film. Foreign ministry spokesp ... read more
![]() |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |